sat may 10th zoom with Amanda ridding

Amanda Ridding returns for a special Stand4THEE Saturday Zoom session, bringing her insight and passion in uncovering the truth about Canada and our Constitution. 

Don’t miss this chance to hear from Amanda and engage in a powerful discussion on the most pressing issues we face in Canada, the de facto Government... and actions we can take to course correct!

Key take-aways:

1. There is NO legal instrument that creates the role of the Prime Minister. The leader of the PRIVATE party with the most seats becomes Prime Minister 
2. Political parties are PRIVATE unincorporated associations; please see Olumide v. Conservative Party of Canada (“OlumideFC”):

• “In the case of Galati v. McGuinty, 88 All-Canada Weekly Summaries (3d) 1165, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dealt with the status of political parties in the context of a complaint similar to that advanced in this case.  There, the Court held:  “The absence of government action is a radical defect in the plaintiff’s claim.  The Ontario Liberal Party is not a government actor.  It is a private unincorporated association.  Its objects may be political in nature, but that is insufficient to drape it with the cloak of government authority.”

1. ALL CAPS name is a very real artificial legal person, or entity, which can otherwise die because it has never breathed life., our SIN registry is UPPER CASE
2. Anything which is tied to land is a covenant runs with the land. Acts of legislation are bound between the territorial Land for which is was made and either the GG or LG of a province, as the case may be
3. Three versions of Canada: 

• “Canada” = proper noun
• “Government of Canada” = proper nou
• “CANADA” = not proper noun (not a fiction, as it does exist)

Link to the chat text: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YwtzhL9_E3_VBufb6MHBR491VwsFYds6/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=118010217996772877595&rtpof=true&sd=true

How can we create change?

1. Change your mindset and take back your authority by trusting that YOU are the ONLY authority over YOU.
2. As there exists no covenant in law to establish the entity known as Prime Minister. If you agree and accept there is no such thing as a Prime Minister, it is your duty to object and deny the existence of a Prime Minister every time someone tries to discuss what the alleged PM is doing next.
3. Working together to take legal action to demonstrate the truth and using the Constitution and the law as the mechanisms of the truth! Planning has begun to bring forward a legal action for as many Canadians to partake in as a possible!

If you missed last week's Zoom (May 2nd) with Amanda, please watch it HERE: https://rumble.com/v6svpp7-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-may-1st-special-guest-amanda-ridding.html.

And be sure to check out, and subscribe, to Amanda's Substack HERE: https://amandaridding.substack.com.

If you like his content, and would like to support our channel, please consider buying us a coffee to help cover our costs. Thank you! https://www.buymeacoffee.com/stand4thee

Watch the replay HERE;

Unplug from the Matrix with special guest Amanda Ridding!

The system of the beast is not just political — it is spiritual. It seeks to sever us from God by reshaping how we see ourselves: not as children of God with dominion, but as subjects of the state. Through bureaucracy, propaganda, and fear, it reverses the natural order — making the public servant the master, and the people the slaves.

But we are made in the image of God — and just as He is Creator, we are co-creators. Law is a reflection of us: our relationships, responsibilities, and conflicts, recorded on paper. It exists because of us, not over us.

Criminal law governs public wrongs — breaches of the social contract. Civil law deals with private harms — breaches of contracts and torts. One protects the collective, the other the individual.

When we formed Canada’s system of government, we created three branches — legislative, executive, and judicial — in our image. This wasn’t random. It was to divide power, so no one branch could dominate. We knew then: absolute power corrupts absolutely.

But over time, the administrative state — unelected and unaccountable — has quietly absorbed both legislative and judicial power. This concentration is a theft of authority and a warning: we are not just facing legal overreach, but a spiritual coup.

Watch the replay to lean how to break free from the chains!

Learn more about Amanda and the work she is doing by signing up to her Substack HERE: https://amandaridding.substack.com

Watch the replay here: https://rumble.com/v6svpp7-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-may-1st-special-guest-amanda-ridding.html

The Law Society of New Brunswick has filed a cease-and-desist application against Mitchell Albert, accusing him of “practicing law” by supporting Tommy Craft—an illiterate man battling the province over the theft of his home—as a McKenzie Friend.

At the April 22 hearing, Law Society rep Norman Bossie raised concerns that Mitchell’s milk crate was secretly recording court proceedings. It wasn’t—it was just a crate.

Despite the flimsy basis of the claim, Bossie continued arguing Mitchell’s courtroom help amounts to unauthorized practice. The Society also cited Mitchell’s and others’ social media posts, demonstrating the province is closely monitoring public discourse.

To top it off, anonymous allegations—read: hearsay—from the “kitty litter crew"were thrown in for good measure. We'll give them an A+ for effort!

Rebecca's Federal challenge regarding the appointment of Mark Carney as the Special Advisor and Chair of the Liberal Party's Task Force on Economic Growth is still a work in progress.

The focus on the claim is asking the crown to PROVE in law Trudeau has the lawful authority to appoint an official and to provide the order in council affirming the appointment.

If you want to assist Rebecca in this endeavour, please sign the declaration affirming your support HERE. You can read the claim HERE.

Watch the replay HERE: https://rumble.com/v6shjad-special-stand4thee-zoom-wed-april-23rd-recording-milk-crates-the-kitty-litt.html

 A lot has happened since we met last, let's get ourselves up-to-date on the goings-on in the world.

First, we have news on the Federal Carney case. The council for the Attorney General responded and Justice Horne asked for a status update and timeline that was submitted today.

Read the Carney Federal court challenge HERE.

Second, Carney has gone on National TV and proclaimed to have "ended the carbon tax" with the stroke of a pen. We all know that is not how things work in the House. Did Carney just commit fraud? Watch the presser HERE.

Info on Carney's "appointment" and "election win:

1. Carney was appointed by Justin Trudeau as Special Advisor and Chair of the Liberal Party's Task Force on Economic Growth with the Liberal Party of Canada (LPC);
2. JT does not have the authority to appoint an official, ONLY the Governor General who is the Head of State can appoint an official;
3. A person who is not officially appointed does not fall under the regulations used as safeguards to prevent conflict of interests nor do they fall under the constitution;
4. Mark Carney admitted he was working with Cabinet and offering his "perspective" which means he was involved in Government business;
5. Mark Carney won the Liberal leadership race through less than 1% of Canadians voting for him;
6. Only 2/3rds of eligible Liberal party members participated in the vote;
7. 3 key candidates were disqualified in the liberal race, and AFTER they had paid the $350K to be in the leadership race;
8. One of the candidates is the riding Mark Carney is now running in. Chandra Arya was barred from the race after 10 years in that riding. They barred him for having alleged ties to India;
9. There are still ELEVEN sitting MPs accused of ties to China and election interference... we STILL don't know who they are;
10. Carney has yet to disclose his assets and because he is not an elected official, there is no law forcing him to. He has moved all of his assets to a private trust to avoid exposure and keep it a secret from the public;
11. The Liberal Party of Canada is a PRIVATE party, it is NOT an agent of the Crown;
12. The LPC falls outside the legal provisions of the Elections Act because they are not an agent of the Crown;
13. The party rules allows for under age voters at the age of 14 and permanent residence, this is in contravention of the Elections Act;
14. Carney committed fraud on live TV when pretending to repeal and Act of Parliament. ONLY an Act of Parliament can change and Act of Parliament.

And, much to our dismay, former Ottawa Detective Helen Grus was found guilty by the tribunal. What's next for Helen? Read more on Helen's story and donate if you can HERE.

Lastly, the world lost a true warrior spirit as David Romleswki passed while on his honeymoon in Jamaica. Will his case continue on? If you can, please support  David's widow to pay for expenses for his funeral and to return his body to Canada, donate HERE.

Watch the Rumble replay here: https://rumble.com/v6rcl3s-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-were-back.html

Please SHARE this with everyone you know! 

On January 23, 2024, many Canadians rejoiced as we were vindicated when Justice Mosley ruled the EA was invoked illegally. After reading the evidence, Mosley, reasonably, concluded the feds acted outside of their lawful authority in declaring a national emergency.

Unfortunately, the celebration was dampened when the feds announced they were appealing Mosley’s decision. 

The Canadian Constitution Foundation faced off in the Federal court this past week to defend the Mosley ruling in front of a panel of judges. Who will win this next challenge?

Join us for a recap of the proceedings from our "court correspondence" Janice who attended the two-day trial. 

Also, check out the CCF recap to get an in-depth report:

Watch the day 1 recap HERE: https://tinyurl.com/bp6kz69u

Watch the day 2 recap HERE: https://tinyurl.com/53mrcmuv

Rumble replay link: On January 23, 2024, many Canadians rejoiced as we were vindicated when Justice Mosley ruled the EA was invoked illegally. After reading the evidence, Mosley, reasonably, concluded the feds acted outside of their lawful authority in declaring a national emergency.

Unfortunately, the celebration was dampened when the feds announced they were appealing Mosley’s decision. 

The Canadian Constitution Foundation faced off in the Federal court this past week to defend the Mosley ruling in front of a panel of judges. Who will win this next challenge?

Join us for a recap of the proceedings from our "court correspondence" Janice who attended the two-day trial. 

Also, check out the CCF recap to get an in-depth report:

Watch the day 1 recap HERE: https://tinyurl.com/bp6kz69u

Watch the day 2 recap HERE: https://tinyurl.com/53mrcmuv

Are You Getting Caught in the Fear Trap?

Recently social media has been flooded with an overwhelming number of stories of doom and gloom, of misinformation and fear mongering. It's becoming increasingly difficult to navigate the water from truth, from fiction and from those just putting out click bait.

Tonight, let's dig into some of the key topics making the rounds from Trumps tariffs, Mark Carney becoming PM and the threat of the Emergencies Act to stall an election.

Plus let's talk about the Ostrich farm win and read between the lines of what was discussed in the courtroom.

Links from the Zoom:

1. Interview with Jesse Hal of the missing link: Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/live/QXi04UWW9SQ?si=DQ0apPUBvyn92SZ0

2. Link to the summary for c40.org https://c40.my.salesforce.com/sfc/p/#36000001Enhz/a/1Q000000MdxA/V3QLW6RLSz3O1N7QGaBkJC_ezIfKteg_zgIe5o5

Replay on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6fly8m-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom.html

The time is now to present legal reasons to each Member of Provincial Parliament (MPP) explaining why the Immunization of School Pupils Act (ISPA), in whole or in part, needs to be abolished. The ISPA, as it stands, conflicts with the British North America Act, 1867 (BNA Act), making it inconsistent with the rule of law and, to the extent of that inconsistency, of no force or effect.

An MPP’s duty is to protect the interests of their constituents, holding a fiduciary duty to the people they represent, not to their political party. The role of an MPP is to create law, not to administer it. While we often write to MPPs to complain about policies, the key to change is demanding that unjust laws be fixed or repealed.

Reasonable, documented demands compel MPPs to address issues brought forward by their constituents. Failure to do so, after being properly notified, could be seen as willful neglect. It is time to hold our elected representatives accountable and remind them of their duty. Amanda Ridding has drafted such a document to compel MPPs to uphold the rule of law and to compel them to END the forced jabs of school students in Ontario and YOU are invited to participate in this action. The demand letter has been drafted and all the instructions can be found on Amanda’s website HERE: https://www.canadianlawstudygroup.com/immunization-school-pupils-act

Stay updated on this effort by returning here or subscribing to Amanda’s Substack for updates on this campaign to challenge the ISPA and restore the rule of law.

What about this prorogue? 

Let's start with the basics. Prorogue means to "end the Parliament session". This happens organically at the end of a session, however, in this case it was Trudeau who requested to prorogue and the Governor General (GG), Mary Simon agreed to it. The PM can only request it, the GG must agree to it. Read more on proroguing Government HERE: https://www.ourcommons.ca/procedure/procedure-and-practice-3/ch_08_6-e.html

What is the impact of proroguing? It means that all debates cease, all committees are dissolved, and all bills are terminated. In short, the House is no longer operating and when the next session does start, current bills need to be reintroduced, and committees reformed.

While it may be true that a member's bill isn't affected in the house, Bill C-293 had moved to the Senate and was at committee. That committee has been dissolved, and they need to reform the committee at the next session... and we'll be ready for them when they do! Bills C-293 has been archived with the previous session, read that HERE: https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/44-1/c-293

But when you get down to it, does this really matter? Is this just another distraction from bigger issues? We know it's an election year so unless a "snap election" is called, what is going to be the result of this prorogue, other than killing some horrible bills and giving us some breathing room!

Watch the replay HERE: https://rumble.com/v680nzy-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-jan-10-what-is-the-impact-of-prorogue.html

After four years of dedication and hard work, Stand4THEE is incredibly proud of all we have accomplished. We are truly grateful for the unwavering support of our passionate and committed community – we couldn't have done it without you! 

As 2025 approaches, we would like to take this time to reflect on our journey and embrace new opportunities to drive meaningful change that reaches far beyond ourselves. 

We invited you to join us to share your thoughts and ideas of how Stand4THEE can re-focus on current issues and how we can support the community. 

Here is what we heard:

1.  Do a better job of promoting us and the work we do.

2.  Host interviews and special guests.

3.  Host educational podcasts.

4.  Finish what we start!

• Bill C-293 action
• Grand Jury, Trudeau4Treason
• Proviate criminal charges

5.  Create working groups on specific topics/issues.

6.  Citizen support group/communal trust.

Thank you all for sharing your thoughts and insights and we’ll be working on realigning our goals and objectives and meaningful action in 2025!

Watch the replay HERE: https://rumble.com/v63g9y2-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-dec-27th-whats-the-future-of-stand4thee.html

We are thrilled to share Isabelle's recent legal victory against the City of Ottawa!

Isabelle had been without water for 3 weeks when the City of Ottawa cut off her water services after she refused to allow the smart meter installation. She finally got her day in court and the court examined the municipality's authority to terminate water services and found that the City had overstepped its legal boundaries.

The judge ordered the immediate restoration of Isabelle's water service, reaffirming that municipalities must operate within the confines of their lawful authority and that municipalities do not have the authority to cut off water services. Congrats Isabelle!

This is an excellent ruling that will support Jaime in her battle against the Town of Kingsville. Watch Jaime's story HERE.

Jaime's next appearance is on Mon, Jan 6th @ 9:30 AM in Windsor Superior Court. Please come out to support!

Links from the Zoom:

- Link to No Trespass sign: https://stand4thee.com/flyers-and-handouts

- Neptune Technology Group; https://www.neptunetg.com/smartcities/

- Municipal Act; https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/01m25

- EMF Help Center - Smart Meter; https://emfhelpcenter.com

- Book; lady https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/194525268-under-a-rock

- Canadians 4 Safety; https://www.facebook.com/C4ST.ORG/

Watch the replay here: https://rumble.com/v61ckqz-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-dec-20-water-is-essential.html

Woman Battles Town to Stop Smart Meter!

Jaime’s battle began in 2023 when the Town of Kingsville sent out a notice informing the community the Town is moving from the existing water meters to Automated Metering Infrastructure (AMI) SMART technology meters. There was no prior notice shared to the residents and therefore no proper consultation.

Jaime’s been diagnosed with lesions on her brain through an MRI scan and suffers severe migraines, dizziness, tingling and burning sensations when she is exposed to EMF technology. She has shared this diagnosis and a doctor’s note that expressly states Jaime is to avoid SMART technology yet the city employees involved in this case have disregarded her condition and the medical note. In doing so, the staff involved have contravened the Regulated Health Professions Act and this carries a hefty penalty.

On Oct 10th, city workers appeared at her house unannounced. She was prepared and had placed the “No trespass” signs on her property and she exercised her right as the owner/occupier of her property and with the assistance of the police the workers left.

Now Jaime is taking the Town to court! Join us to tonight to hear her story!

Links from the Zoom:

- Link to No Trespass sign: https://stand4thee.com/flyers-and-handouts

- Neptune Technology Group; https://www.neptunetg.com/smartcities/

- Municipal Act; https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/01m25

- EMF Help Center - Smart Meter; https://emfhelpcenter.com

- Book; lady https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/194525268-under-a-rock

- Canadians 4 Safety; https://www.facebook.com/C4ST.ORG/

Watch the replay here: https://rumble.com/v5j7tbp-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-oct-18-taking-on-the-town.html

TOGETHER, WE CAN STOP Bill C-293!

Bill C-293 has started moving through the Senate again and was debated at Committee this past Tuesday. You can read the transcript from the committee HERE: https://www.parl.ca/LegisInfo/en/bill/44-1/C-293?view=details#bill-profile-tabs

While there are a lot of major concerns about this bill, one of the most interesting is that this is a private member's bill put forward by MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith of East Beaches in Toronto. We'll dig into what a "private member's bill” from a procedural perspective tonight

The purpose of the bill is to create a domestic legal framework to implement the WHO Pandemic Treaty with the ultimate goal of creating a "One Health" system. The provisions in this bill expand into all facets of our lives; healthcare, agriculture, logistics, mobility, etc. And it further aims to put all the power into one individual, the Minister of Health, by bypassing Parliamentary oversight that is required in a democracy. You can read more on the dangers of this bill HERE: https://canucklaw.ca/bill-c-293-international-pandemic-treaty-revisited

Actions you can take now! 

1. Join us in our working sessions as we produce legal strategies to stop the bill. Meeting times are posted under “events" 
2. Email the senate and tell them to KILL the Bill;
3. Email the Bill sponsor, Nathaniel Erskine-Smith to tell him to rescind this Bill;
4. Download the social posts and share them on your channels;
5. Talk to your friends and family to help educate them.

All the above information can be found HERE.https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1KmYlke-1-Ds_JTJkBihrfqS8RQ1B5Rut?usp=sharing

Join us Sun, Nov 3rd @ 8PM (EST) for a working session to take action to KILL Bill C-293! 

Zoom link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88194918110

Watch the replay HERE: https://rumble.com/v5k4wxx-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-oct-25-kill-the-bill.html

We are so sadden to report that we received the call this morning that Tommy's home has been destroyed. We found out the province the pushed through a city permit and demolished his home even though litigation is pending. We’ll discuss the next steps for Tommy.

Bill C-293, the Pandemic Treaty is moving through the senate with only 2 more readings. Can the Senate kill a bill? Yes, they can through a "hoist", "reasoned" or "deferral motion"! 

Also, Cullen's appeal is coming up fast! One of the most important cases in Canada. We need to fill the court room on Oct 11, @ 10am in Welland! 

Finally, is small claims the right venue for suing the government over the Emergencies Act?

Links shared in the Zoom:

- Public interest for King v McDonald: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1piEIk-5BBtzvjZyXT7iY5jEJt1INFxRz/edit

- Download the senate letter for Bill C-293, WHO Pandemic Treaty HERE: https://tinyurl.com/3u4bnpxv

- Senate procedures on how the Senate can use Hoist, Reason or Referral to KILL a BILL: https://sencanada.ca/en/about/procedural-references/notes/n5?fbclid=IwY2xjawFa4thleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHfbwSp4koh9tMn1J8zA9bPvG1xDnC6r6zBHENAg1_1IBkUEQFOdRYEHzyg_aem_w4a0weBZdOtW9u3GS2EG

- Bird flu summit NY Oct 2nd: Senate procedures: https://sencanada.ca/en/about/procedural-references/notes/n5?fbclid=IwY2xjawFa4thleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHfbwSp4koh9tMn1J8zA9bPvG1xDnC6r6zBHENAg1_1IBkUEQFOdRYEHzyg_aem_w4

- Federal courts are statute, therefore bastard courts: https://www.fct-cf.gc.ca/en/pages/about-the-court/jurisdiction

- History of Courts Ontario explaining inherent jurisdiction: https://www.ontariocourts.ca/scj/about/history/

-  Fundraiser for Loving Mom fighting the CCLA's challenge of New Brunswick's Policy 713: https://www.givesendgo.com/leave-our-kids-alone

Watch the live replay HERE:https://rumble.com/v5fqhmt-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-sept-20-jam-packed-night.html

Rebecca shared the incredible corruption she faced during her trial in Mississauga this past week.

On Tues, Aug 20th, Rebecca returned to the Mississauga courthouse to finish the trial for failing to comply with a section 58 the Quarantine Act for not complying with the unlawful demand to perform a PCR test. 

It was obvious the JP arrived to the courtroom with a guilty verdict. Rebecca stood up against perjury, bullying, attempted sabotage and intimidation and eventually forced the hand of the prosector to drop the charges.

The actions of the Crown Patterson, JP McLear and Court Admin Polley, are unacceptable and expose the corruption of the court.

Plus get the latest on the battle to save Tommy's home. The province is in for a long battle, they most likely won't win!

Links discussed in the Zoom:

1. Quarantine Act: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/q-1.1/FullText.html

2. Contraventions Act: https://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-38.7/FullText.html

3. Application of Provincial Laws Regulations: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/sor-96-312/FullText.html

4. Department of Justice Act: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/j-2/FullText.html

5. Department of Health Act: https://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/H-3.2/

6. Constitution Act:  https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/FullText.html

Watch the replay HERE: https://rumble.com/v5c53cd-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-aug-23rd-court-of-injustice.html

How well do you know the Canadian Government system? 

Before going too far into this topic, it’s fair to state that everyone is feeling that there are major concerns in our current world and that change is needed. 

However, there is a growing trend to “exit the system” or to create a “new system”. You will hear terms like “de facto” government or fingers being pointed at the Crown as to the cause of the significant local and international issues we are currently facing.

While we can assume that most who hold this viewpoint are sincere and believe this to be the only way, we need to peel back the onion to get an understanding of the bigger picture. This starts with developing a solid awareness of the government framework that makes up Canada. 

Let’s start with a few questions that we will discuss as a group: 

1. Who is the head of state in Canada? 
2. Who/what makes up the government of Canada? 
3. What is the role of the MPs? 

It’s key that we understand the framework of Canada and the roles of the Government. Through this we will very quickly realize the perversion that has taken place in the house and the legislature. Out of this realization we can look to restore true government and seek accountability.

Links from the discussion:

1.  Constitution Act 1867 – 1982, https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/FullText.html

2.  Trudeau Infrastructure Announcement 2020 Toronto, https://www.cpac.ca/headline-politics/episode/pm-trudeau-on-toronto-floods-canada-public-transit-fund--july-17-2024?id=5c880b70-b22b-4ff7-9723-48529eb800e2 – at the 7:11 mark

3.  Amanda Ridding’s Substack, https://amandaridding.substack.com

4.  Rules of Civil Procedure, Small Claims, https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/980258

5.  Charter of Rights, Chartepedia, https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art1.html

6.  Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Schedule B, https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/laws/stat/schedule-b-to-the-canada-act-1982-uk-1982-c-11/latest/schedule-b-to-the-canada-act-1982-uk-1982-c-11.html

7.  Municipal Act, Ontario, https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/01m25

Watch the replay HERE: https://rumble.com/v59i09o-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-aug-2nd-who-is-the-government.html

There is a lot going on, and we had a LOT to talk about!

First, we’ve been digging around into government ArriveSCAM contracts and well, things aren’t as they seem. Most of you are probably familiar with Botler, the original whistleblower, and GC Strategies contractor currently in the hot seat for ArriveSCAM. What if there were no contracts found for Botler nor CBSA contracts for GC Strategies in the Government database? Wouldn’t that raise an eyebrow given the committee is ONLY focusing on GC Strategies, who has NO history of contracts with the CBSA? 

We've been doing forensics and there is a whole lotta mistruths going on in the committee. Here are the findings of this preliminary ArriveSCAM contract research from the Fed government database:
1. Dalian was awarded $8 million in CBSA contracts 2019 - 2023

2. Coradix was awarded a staggering $63 million in CBSA contracts
 Note: the entirety of Coradix contracts totals =$1 BILLION DOLLARS IN 10 YEARS

3. BDO awarded $44 million in CBSA contracts from 2020-2024

4. KPMG awarded $973,000 in contracts from 2018 – 2023

5. Botler AI = ZERO CONTRACTS

6. GC Strategies = ZERO CONTRACTS

Total IT contracts with CBSA in 5 years = $115 MILLION!

All the spreadsheets from these contracts have been archived for your perusing HERE.

If this has piqued your curiosity you can do your own search on the Federal contract database HERE.

Also, a follow up on the Quarantine Act win, R v Fernando that found the PCR test unlawful per section 14.1 of the Act. GREAT news for anyone continuing in court. Yesterday in R v. Szacon the defendant's charges under section 14.1 were dismissed after being arraigned! This means, if you have charges for PCR, request the charges be dismissed if the Crown doesn't.

Finally, we have direction from a process server so let’s discuss as a group the next steps for serving the small claims to the Liberal criminals! Read the rules for service of small claims HERE.

Watch the replay HERE: https://rumble.com/v57msth-july-19-2024.html

In 2022 alone, over 19,000 Canadians refused to comply with the unlawful Quarantine Orders totalling a whopping $15 million in fines and countless hours in the courtroom. Many, despite their best arguments, were convicted and forced to pay thousands of dollars in fines.

The tides are turning friends! On June 26th in the Ontario Court of Justice on appeal, Judge Monahan was compelled to overturn and acquit a fine of $5,000.00 to Ms. Fernando, a traveller who refused to consent to a PCR test. The argument had been brought before the courts countless times; section 14 of the Quarantine Act clearly states that a foreign instrument cannot be inserted into the body as a screening tool and without success.

Chris Weisdorf, (a non- lawyer) presented excellent arguments and Judge Monahan, who is a seasoned Superior Court Judge, agreed and ruled in Chris’ favor and the conviction was overturned! 

The following arguments are now cemented in this case law, R. v. Fernando:
- The Justice of the Peace had not addressed the argument under section 14 of the Quarantine Act;
- The Act doesn't allow for the use of PCR as screening test as it's a foreign object entering the body;
- The Quarantine Act specifically says that screening technology maybe used that does not involve entry into the human body;
- The Governor General may not deny entry of a Canadian Citizen into the country when they're entering from a country with a communicable disease when Canada is prepared (which Canada was);
- The PCR test met the Oxford dictionary definition of an instrument;
- The PCR test met the Oxford dictionary definition of a foreign body;
- The Order in Council did not expand the powers to health agents;
- Pre-arrival tests performed in other countries were not part of this ruling;
- The refusal was lawful and should not have been found guilty by the Justice of the Peace.

In addition to this win, If you were charged AFTER Oct 26, 2021, you might want to consider firing up your appeal application!  

On Mon, April 22nd during Rebecca's trial for failing to do the PCR test at Pearson Airport it was discovered that the Public Health Agency of Canada screening and quarantine officers were failing to follow the rules in the Quarantine Act.

The PHAC screening officers are REQUIRED to follow these sections of the Quarantine Act... instead, the PHAC screening officers and the PHAC quarantine regional managers made a unilateral decision to disregard the requirements set out in section 16(1)(b) of the Quarantine Act.   

Quarantine Act: Screening technology14 (1) Any qualified person authorized by the Minister may, to determine whether a traveller has a communicable disease or symptoms of one, use any screening technology authorized by the Minister that does not involve the entry into the traveller’s body of any instrument or other foreign body. 

Obligation to inform16 (1) A screening officer shall immediately inform a quarantine officer, and follow any directive of that officer respecting the traveller, if  (b) a traveller has refused to be screened by the screening officer under subsection 14(1), or a person authorized to use the screening technology has informed the screening officer that a traveller has refused to be screened under that subsection;
The PHAC officers had ONE job... to administer the Quarantine Act in its entirety. They were not there to decide which parts of the act to exclude, that is above their pay grade.

What does this mean for the rest of us? First, it confirms WE CAN WIN in the court. Second, it solidifies that those responsible for enforcing law are obligated to follow the law!

If you are still battling charges for refusing the PCR test when returning to Canada this is your new argument! If you WERE convicted, you need be EXONERATED and your money returned to you!

Links from the Zoom:
- Link to CanLii to request the ruling be uploaded; Here is the link to Canlii: https://www.canlii.org/en/feedback/feedback.html - Case info: Name of court, board or tribunal - Ontario court of justice Case name - Peel Region Date of decision - Wed, June 26, 2024 Docket or file number Name of judge or adjudicator - Judge Monahan
- Link to Cullen's fundraiser to buy transcripts for his appeal and legal consultation, the most significant cases in Canada today; https://fundrazr.com/02Lo10?ref=ab_AVbHmQaNFazAVbHmQaNFaz

- Fund raiser for Byron Carr, https://fundrazr.com/c2OiLf?ref=ab_0DDzM3_ab_4CSkMvokaXh4CSkMvokaXh&utm_campaign=campaign-launched-notification&utm_medium=email&utm_source=05-2024
- Link to Industry Advisory Table: Link to advisory table, https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/covid19-industry/medical-devices/testing-outreach-collaboration/industry-advisory-roundtable/members.html

Watch the replay here: https://rumble.com/v54e3ap-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-june-28-quarantine-act-win.html