No friday night zoom march 6th
We all deserve a break now and then, and tonight is one of those nights BUT you can still take action!
First, have you heard about the Alto High Speed Rail from Quebec City to Toronto and the associated legislation, Bill C-15? The information below was shared from Angela Bakker in Ontario, and there are steps you can take to help support our farmers!
From Angela:
I attended an Alto information session last evening. My goal was to simply listen, learn, and understand the perspectives in the room.
What I encountered was a wide range of voices - farmers concerned about generational land, property owners worried about uncertainty and others who simply felt uneasy.
I noticed a gap between technical planning and public understanding. Through conversations with other attendees I realized that most were not reacting to the concept of the rail in principle but with the uncertainty about land, livelihoods, timelines, and transparency.
In my opinion, better structure and clarity in communication on the part of Alto would have changed the tone of the meeting. Showing a preferred route alongside alternatives, explaining what stage the project is in, and speaking directly to property impacts would have helped people engage with facts rather than fears.
Clear communication wouldn't remove disagreement but it sure would create the conditions for informed judgement and I believe that is what public consultation should strive to provide. The complete lack of transparency and lack of answers to even the most basic of questions has me very concerned. The Alto reps were acting like the decision has already been made but it's like they got shoved at us without knowing many facts about the project.
So here is what I did learn. There are 2 proposed rail corridors 10 km wide. Our farm is in the northern corridor. I placed a red dot in the area where our farms are located.
From what little I got from the meeting, the Northern route is preferred. The exact location of the rail is unknown but my guess (along with some of the reps) is it will run along the main hydro lines. These lines run straight through one of my rental farms and would also block me from reaching my main rental farm (which has even more pasture than my own property) which I use to pasture my cattle. I need to get to them usually twice a day during the growing season. They may also need to take some of our farm to have access during the building phase because of a river that blocks them access. But I'm only guessing here. Like I mentioned above, the uncertainties of this project is next level.
What about Emergency service or fire access? These trains are not like other trains with vehicle crossings. The only way to cross a track is by overhead bridge or under ground which only happens along "main" roads and highways. What is their definition of "main"?
While I was talking with an Alto rep they explained to me how a project like this is difficult in a democratic country like ours compared to China. This is where Bill C-15 comes in.
Buried inside this bill, a 600-page omnibus budget bill, is the High-Speed Rail Network Act. First reading was November 18, 2025. It passed the House of Commons February 26th, 2026 and is now before the Senate - moving fast and deliberately under the radar.
Here's what's in it: Under normal Canadian law, the government has to try to negotiate with you before expropriating your land. Bill C-15 removes that requirement entirely for this project. They can take first, compensate later - on their terms. The bill also strips away standard notice obligations, meaning less warning and less time to respond.
So do I go ahead and build the barns and outbuildings I need or should I stop development? I don't want to put more money into our farm if we're going to be expropriated and given peanuts for it. Instead should I focus on saving all our income to put towards purchasing another farm? Will I be able to find or afford another farm?
Alto should not need this bill to pass if they intend to expropriate people in a respectful and lawful manner! This is my main concern.
People are about to lose their homes, their livelihoods, their farms (possibly us), everything. I believe this is an EMERGENCY! This is sickening. I learned last evening that this is a $90-$120 Billion dollar project. Why is it not splashed all over the news?
Please watch this video as it does a great job at expressing our (as well as our communities) concerns:
If you live in a small town or rural area between Toronto and Quebec City and if you are a land owner, it would be a good idea to learn more about this train approval.
Along with the feeling I got at the ALTO meeting, there are a few other red flags I've noticed about this project that I won't get into here. It has me wondering if it could just be a large scale land grab? I wonder if this project will ever even begin construction. The Canadian government will still seize the land but it won’t be used for a rail line. Instead, they potentially could keep the land until they can quietly turn it into a protected wildlife corridor as part of their commitment to restore 30% of Canada’s developed land by 2030.
Where did I get this idea from? Remember in 1972 when 18,600 acres of mostly Class 1 farmland in north Pickering was expropriated by the Federal government for an airport that was never built? Bill C-15 makes the Pickering land grab look like a picnic.
If you are concerned about the potential impacts of the Alto high-speed rail project on our town, our rural roads, local businesses, and ultimately our tax dollars, I encourage you to sign this petition and contact the Senators who now hold final approval of Bill C-15.
Your message does not need to be lengthy or complicated. JUST SEND SOMETHING. You might simply state that:
- You do not believe Canadians can afford a project estimated at $90–$120 billion, particularly given the likelihood of cost overruns.
- You are concerned that Canada’s electricity grid is already under pressure and may not have the capacity to support this project.
- You lack confidence that the government will deliver as promised, citing past projects such as the proposed Pickering Airport and the planned upgrades at CFB Trenton that did not proceed as originally presented and yet the land they expropriated was never returned to the original owners.
In government decision-making, silence is often interpreted as acceptance. **If you have concerns, now is the time to make your voice heard.**
This should make it easier for you to copy and paste for your email. Please take 5 minutes to help your farmer, your friends, your family, your neighbours and your fellow Canadians who need you right now. PLEASE SHARE THIS MESSAGE FAR AND WIDE!
Here is the link to the petition: Petition to the House of Commons
Here is a list of the Senators that will most likely be voting on Bill C-15 in the coming weeks:
Willie Adams
Margaret Dawn Anderson
MargaretDawn.Anderson@sen.parl.gc.ca
Raynell Andreychuk
raynell.andreychuk@sen.parl.gc.ca
David M. Arnot
Michèle Audette
michele.audette@sen.parl.gc.ca
Yvonne Boyer
Diane Bellemare
diane.bellemare@sen.parl.gc.ca
Robert Black
Sharon Burey
Larry Campbell
René Cormier
Rodger Cuzner
Pierre J. Dalphond
pierrej.dalphond@sen.parl.gc.ca
Colin Deacon
Tony Dean
Dennis Dawson
Jean-Guy Dagenais
jean-guy.dagenais@sen.parl.gc.ca
Baltej S. Dhillon
baltej.s.dhillon@sen.parl.gc.ca
Pat Duncan
Renée Dupuis
Éric Forest
Brian Francis
Rosa Galvez
Marc Gold
Margo Greenwood
margo.greenwood@sen.parl.gc.ca
Stephen Greene
Nancy Hartling
Leo Housakos
Mobina S. B. Jaffer
Nancy Karetak-Lindell
nancy.karetak-lindell@sen.parl.gc.ca
Marty Klyne
Stan Kutcher
stanley.kutcher@sen.parl.gc.ca
Patti LaBoucane-Benson
patti.laboucane-benson@sen.parl.gc.ca
Tony Loffreda
Jane MacAdam
Paul J. Massicotte
paul.j.massicotte@sen.parl.gc.ca
Mary Jane McCallum
maryjane.mccallum@sen.parl.gc.ca
Marilou McPhedran
marilou.mcphedran@sen.parl.gc.ca
Marie-Françoise Mégie
marie-francoise.megie@sen.parl.gc.ca
Julie Miville-Dechêne
julie.miville-dechene@sen.parl.gc.ca
Farah Mohamed
Jim Munson
Thanh Hai Ngo
Ratna Omidvar
Flordeliz (Gigi) Osler
flordeliz.osler@sen.parl.gc.ca
Rebecca Patterson
rebecca.patterson@sen.parl.gc.ca
Chantal Petitclerc
chantal.petitclerc@sen.parl.gc.ca
Sandra Pupatello
sandra.pupatello@sen.parl.gc.ca
Pierrette Ringuette
pierrette.ringuette@sen.parl.gc.ca
Krista Ross
Raymonde Saint-Germain
raymonde.saint-germain@sen.parl.gc.ca
Paula Simons
Karen Sorensen
Scott Tannas
Wanda Thomas Bernard
wandathomas.bernard@sen.parl.gc.ca
Judy White
Yuen Pau Woo
Hassan Yussuff
THANK YOU FOR TAKING ACTION! Whether it's phone call, an email, or sharing this story, every action taken helps!
Although this is concerning and heartbreaking, we're not worried or stressing too much about it (at least not to the degree some of our neighbours are). Our heavenly Father has proven over and over again that he will take care of our family so maybe it's easier for us not to worry. May His will be done in all of our lives!}}
Sincerely,
Angela Bakker
jubileeforestfarm.com
FRIDAY ZOOM FEB 27th @ 8PM (EST) - EI Misconduct Dismissed
This past week, the EI Misconduct case was heard before the Federal Court of Appeal, and the decision was released in an unusually short turnaround. The panel of Justice Walker, Justice Locke, and Justice LeBlanc determined that the appeal did not establish an “unreasonableness” of the SST Tribunal’s decision and therefore the case was dismissed without costs.
This outcome is significant. The case raised serious questions about how “misconduct” is being interpreted under the Act, whether statutory obligations were properly applied, and whether Canadians who were denied EI benefits received a lawful and meaningful analysis of their circumstances. The speed of the decision has left many with questions that deserve careful discussion.
Tonight, Matthew and Dale Arnold will be joining us to walk through what the Court said, where they believe the reasoning falls short, and what options may still be available moving forward. We will also discuss what this decision means for the thousands of Canadians who were impacted.
Lear more about this case HERE: https://blog.justice4eimisconduct.com/p/home
Join us tonight, Friday, February 27th at 8PM EST, to understand what just happened and what comes next.
Zoom link:https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88194918110
Rumble link: https://rumble.com/v76dqbc-s4t-friday-zoom-feb-27-ei-misconduct-ruling.html
FRIDAY ZOOM FEB 20th @ 8PM (EST) -Trial by intimidation
A Courtroom Marked by Exclusion, Isolation, and Provocation
Tonight, Bozena will take you inside the Gatineau courtroom and recount what unfolded.
What was supposed to be a Small Claims hearing about a $10,000 civil assault claim that stemmed from the November 13, 2021 arrest where her injured hand was twisted and a mask was forcibly placed on her face while she was handcuffed despite a documented medical exemption and PTSD - became something else entirely.
Attendees were ordered to leave their personal belongings at the door. Individuals with visible disabilities were removed or turned away because of their symptoms and needs. Bozena filed a motion requesting a support person due to PTSD, was initially granted, only for it to be withdrawn for the mistake of raising an eyebrow. Throughout the hearing, the judge, defence lawyer, and defendant communicated in French, knowing Bozena is not bilingual.
Instead of a focused examination of the alleged assault, the atmosphere felt adversarial, tense, and politically charged.
Join us tonight as Bozena, and those in attendance, break down the events that took place in attempt to derail Bozena's case.
Rumble replay link: https://rumble.com/v761pqe-s4t-friday-zoom-feb-20th-trial-intimidation.html
Friday Zoom Jan 16th - Canadian values at risk
Tonight, we are hosting an in-depth briefing on the Muslim Brotherhood’s presence and influence in Canada, based on documented research and Federal financial records.
Grounded in a strategic threat analysis, this session will unpack the operations of Brotherhood-linked organizations in Canada, the scale of public funding involved, and why these patterns warrant closer scrutiny.
Key issues we’ll examine:
* Millions in public funding directed to Muslim Brotherhood–linked organizations, including major recipients in the charity, advocacy, and non-profit sectors
* Institutional influence across education systems, school boards, teachers’ unions, immigration policy, and political advocacy
* The role of “Islamophobia” and Anti-Palestinian Racism (APR) frameworks in shaping policy, chilling debate, and embedding ideology into public institutions
* The historical roots of the Muslim Brotherhood, its stated objectives, ideological foundations, and documented links to extremist movements globally
Why Canada’s current environment, weak oversight, mass immigration policy, and vote-bank politics, creates fertile ground for ideological capture.
This discussion is not about religion, but about ideology, governance, and public accountability. The goal is to provide Canadians with context, evidence, and a framework to understand how organized movements can shape policy and institutions over time, often without public awareness.
This discussion is for anyone concerned about transparency, national security, free expression, and the challenge posed by Islamist extremism to Western values including equality, civil liberties, and secular law.
Zoom link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88194918110
Rumble link: https://rumble.com/v74fcni-s4t-friday-zoom-jan-16th-8pm-est.html
Friday night zoom Dec 26 - Judicial review filed!
We did it guys! The judicial review of Bill C-3 has officially been filed in Federal Court!
This application doesn’t challenge the legislation itself, rather it’s poking holes in the processes and procedures, or lack thereof, used in pushing this bill through the House and rushing it through the Senate in record time. It questions how a bill with permanent, generational consequences was rushed through Parliament without scrutiny and safeguards. The record put before the Court details extraordinary Senate acceleration, rule suspension, same-day readings, and a committee process built on a skewed and incomplete evidentiary record.
Even more concerning, Parliament crammed this through without population, housing, infrastructure, health-care, or fiscal impact assessments, while openly acknowledging those impacts were unknown. The bill’s urgency was tied to a provincial, not Federal, court deadline that was later extended, raising very serious questions about whether the rush was necessary, or manufactured.
Tonight’s Zoom is about taking stock of this moment. We’ll walk through the filing, what’s next and how we must work together to bring this case to the light!
Join us tonight to dig into the filing and move this forward together!
Zoom link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88194918110
Rumble: https://rumble.com/v73i34i-s4t-friday-zoom-dec-26th-filed.html
Friday Zoom Dec 19th - Bill C-3 Judicial Review Proceeds
An executive was made, we are going to proceed with the judicial review application of Bill C-3! What happens next, is that we proceed with the application using the knowledge and tools that we have. Because if we do nothing, we get nothing, but if we try, we open possibilities.
In Air Canada v. Toronto Port Authority, the Federal Court of Appeal established an eight-factor test used to decide whether a matter is public enough to be reviewed by the Court. This case checks all the boxes:
- There is a serious justiciable issue to be tried.
- The applicant has a genuine interest in the matter
- There is no other reasonable and effective manner to bring the issue before the court
- The issue raises questions of public importance, not just private rights
- The litigation would contribute to the proper administration of justice
- The matter affects a broad segment of the public, or a vulnerable group
- Judicial resources would be used responsibly and proportionately
- Granting standing serves the interests of justice overall
We’ll connect these points directly to Bill C-3, parliamentary process concerns, and why visible public engagement is essential to meeting this threshold.
We’re also joined by Matthew from Justice 4 EI Misconduct, to review his press release as this case is now heading toward Federal Court in early February. He is asking for help to connect with media and ensure his story is heard before that next step.
If due process and accountability matter to you, this is a conversation worth being part of!
Zoom link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88194918110
Rumble: https://rumble.com/v738j2y-s4t-friday-zoom-dec-19th-bill-c-3-jr-update.html
If you missed last week's Zoom, you can watch that here, Rumble link: https://rumble.com/v72y3y2-s4t-friday-zoom-dec-12th-salad-debates-and-traitors.html
Friday Zoom Oct 3 - While You've Been Distracted
This week, we’re cutting through the noise, the division, the distractions and digging into the big issues hiding in the shadows. False flags, psyops, and the endless media spin keep Canadians looking in the wrong direction, while critical changes are pushed through Parliament unnoticed.
- Canada Post to Discontinue Door-to-Door Service:
Canada Post has planning to discontinue door-to-door service, one of the reasons for the union strike. There’s a catch… did you know that Canada Post owns 91% of Purolator and that many of the Canada Post executives are also sitting on the Purolator board, including Canada Post's President and CEO, Doug Ettinger?
- Bill C-9, Combatting Hate Act:
Expands hate-crime provisions, removes the Attorney General’s oversight on prosecutions, and criminalizes the “public display” of certain symbols. Civil liberties groups warn it could chill free speech, criminalize protest, and give prosecutors broad unchecked discretion.
https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/45-1/bill/C-9/first-reading
- Bill C-2, Strong Borders Act
Introduces sweeping “lawful access” powers hidden in border legislation. Agencies could demand private subscriber info and metadata from internet providers without a warrant, with blanket immunity for companies that comply. A massive expansion of surveillance under the guise of border security.
https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/45-1/bill/C-2/first-reading
- Bill C-8, Cybersecurity Act / Critical Cyber Systems Protection Act
Grants the government power to order telecoms and infrastructure providers to “do anything, or refrain from doing anything” to secure networks, including building backdoors. Non-compliance can bring huge fines, while there is no compensation if companies are harmed by government orders.
https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/45-1/bill/C-8/first-reading
These aren’t small changes. They’re part of a coordinated shift toward centralized control, surveillance, and suppression of dissent. Don’t miss this session, it’s time to stay informed and connected.
Zoom link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88194918110
Rumble link: https://rumble.com/v6ztwfc-s4t-friday-zoom-oct-3rd-while-youre-distracted.html
Friday zoom May 30th - christine massey
Since 2020, Christine has filed over 200 Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to health agencies around the world, asking for records proving the isolation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus directly from a patient sample, without the use of animal or lab-grown cell cultures. Not one has confirmed the existence of COVID.
Massey's work has gained traction among activists and anyone who is questioning the legitimacy of the pandemic response and narrative. She continues to educate the public through independent media and her social channels. Check out her Substack HERE: https://substack.com/@christinemasseyfois.
Below are the links shared during the Zoom:
1. Fluoride Free Peel: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca
2. Christine's latest post on the bird flu hoax: https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/bird-flu-hoax-alert-us-animal-and
3. Roman Bystrianyk Twitter: https://x.com/RBystrianyk/status/1824894452097245467
4. Dr. Mike Yeadon, transmission failure: https://drmikeyeadon.substack.com/p/transmission-failure
5. Spanish flu, germ warfare: https://www.jermwarfare.social/p/michael-bryant-spanish-flu-myth
6. DNA barcoding: https://ibol.org/about/dna-barcoding/
7. Leaked PHAC video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ob0xqGC125U
8. Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and 9. The Forgotten History: https://dissolvingillusions.com/
10. McMaster inhaled COVID vaccine: https://healthsci.mcmaster.ca/made-at-mcmaster-inhaled-covid-19-vaccine-begins-phase-2-human-trial/
12. Bio Solutions inhaled vaccine: https://immunebiosolutions.com/en/immune-biosolutions-a-step-closer-to-the-first-inhaled-antibody-treatment-for-covid-19/
13. Bowen Island 2021 article, B.C. ostrich farm developing antibodies that could put an end to coronavirus: https://www.bowenislandundercurrent.com/coronavirus-covid-19-local-news/bc-ostrich-farm-developing-antibodies-that-could-put-an-end-to-coronavirus-4216550
14. Has a virus ever been proven to exist: https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/has-a-virus-ever-actually-been-shown-to-exist
15. Canuck law, ostrich farm, part 1: https://canucklaw.ca/universal-ostrich-farms-1/
16. Canuck law, ostrich farm, part 2: https://canucklaw.ca/universal-ostrich-farms-2/
17. Canuck law, ostrich farms, part 3: https://canucklaw.ca/universal-ostrich-farms-3/
18. Canuck law, ostrich farms, part 4: https://canucklaw.ca/universal-ostrich-farms-4/
19. Canuck law, ostrich farms, part 5: https://canucklaw.ca/universal-ostrich-farms-5/
20. Canuck law, ostrich farms, part 6 https://canucklaw.ca/universal-ostrich-farms-6/
21. Canuck law, ostrich farms, part 7: https://canucklaw.ca/universal-ostrich-farms-7/
20. Canuck law, ostrich farms, part 8 https://canucklaw.ca/universal-ostrich-farms-8/
22. Glowing masks detect COVID: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/dec/10/scientists-ostrich-cells-glowing-covid-detection-masks
23. CFIA statement: https://www.canada.ca/en/food-inspection-agency/news/2025/05/update-on-the-cfias-actions-at-an-hpai-infected-premise-at-a-british-columbia-ostrich-farm.html
Two corrections from previous public statements:
1. There is no evidence the eggs were injected. The documents state the hens were injected with the dead virus, see: https://www.bowenislandundercurrent.com/coronavirus-covid-19-local-news/bc-ostrich-farm-developing-antibodies-that-could-put-an-end-to-coronavirus-4216550
2. The cull order was not issued by the court, the role the court played was to dismiss the appeal and gave the CFIA the green light to cull the birds, see: https://canucklaw.ca/wp-content/uploads/Ostrich-Ruling-Of-Justice-Zinn.pdf
DOWNLOAD RESOURCES FOR FARMERS:
1. Please download the Inspector Forms and have them ready at your farm or ranch should you be visited by inspectors. Back yard chicken farmers would be well advised to do this as well:https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn%3Aaaid%3Asc%3AUS%3A0c5252f8-5267-4468-825d-2e27945abd1a/?promoid=QGMZPG6T&locale=en-US&mv2=ahome&x-product-location=RecentsNew&x-product=CCHome&filetype=application%2Fpdf&viewer%21megaVerb=group-discover
2. No trespass sign: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1k5D38CmxCtZx4-SOZ8PU5E_EFVeo3iZJ?usp=sharing
Thank you for your attention regarding the important conversation with Christine and her work!
SPECIAL ZOOM REPLAY APRIL 23 - MILK CrATES
The Law Society of New Brunswick has filed a cease-and-desist application against Mitchell Albert, accusing him of “practicing law” by supporting Tommy Craft—an illiterate man battling the province over the theft of his home—as a McKenzie Friend.
At the April 22 hearing, Law Society rep Norman Bossie raised concerns that Mitchell’s milk crate was secretly recording court proceedings. It wasn’t—it was just a crate.
Despite the flimsy basis of the claim, Bossie continued arguing Mitchell’s courtroom help amounts to unauthorized practice. The Society also cited Mitchell’s and others’ social media posts, demonstrating the province is closely monitoring public discourse.
To top it off, anonymous allegations—read: hearsay—from the “kitty litter crew"were thrown in for good measure. We'll give them an A+ for effort!
Rebecca's Federal challenge regarding the appointment of Mark Carney as the Special Advisor and Chair of the Liberal Party's Task Force on Economic Growth is still a work in progress.
The focus on the claim is asking the crown to PROVE in law Trudeau has the lawful authority to appoint an official and to provide the order in council affirming the appointment.
If you want to assist Rebecca in this endeavour, please sign the declaration affirming your support HERE. You can read the claim HERE.
Watch the replay HERE: https://rumble.com/v6shjad-special-stand4thee-zoom-wed-april-23rd-recording-milk-crates-the-kitty-litt.html
Friday Night Zoom Replay Dec 20th - Water IS Essential
We are thrilled to share Isabelle's recent legal victory against the City of Ottawa!
Isabelle had been without water for 3 weeks when the City of Ottawa cut off her water services after she refused to allow the smart meter installation. She finally got her day in court and the court examined the municipality's authority to terminate water services and found that the City had overstepped its legal boundaries.
The judge ordered the immediate restoration of Isabelle's water service, reaffirming that municipalities must operate within the confines of their lawful authority and that municipalities do not have the authority to cut off water services. Congrats Isabelle!
This is an excellent ruling that will support Jaime in her battle against the Town of Kingsville. Watch Jaime's story HERE.
Jaime's next appearance is on Mon, Jan 6th @ 9:30 AM in Windsor Superior Court. Please come out to support!
Links from the Zoom:
- Link to No Trespass sign: https://stand4thee.com/flyers-and-handouts
- Neptune Technology Group; https://www.neptunetg.com/smartcities/
- Municipal Act; https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/01m25
- EMF Help Center - Smart Meter; https://emfhelpcenter.com
- Book; lady https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/194525268-under-a-rock
- Canadians 4 Safety; https://www.facebook.com/C4ST.ORG/
Watch the replay here: https://rumble.com/v61ckqz-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-dec-20-water-is-essential.html
Friday Night Zoom Replay Oct 18 - Taking on the Town
Woman Battles Town to Stop Smart Meter!
Jaime’s battle began in 2023 when the Town of Kingsville sent out a notice informing the community the Town is moving from the existing water meters to Automated Metering Infrastructure (AMI) SMART technology meters. There was no prior notice shared to the residents and therefore no proper consultation.
Jaime’s been diagnosed with lesions on her brain through an MRI scan and suffers severe migraines, dizziness, tingling and burning sensations when she is exposed to EMF technology. She has shared this diagnosis and a doctor’s note that expressly states Jaime is to avoid SMART technology yet the city employees involved in this case have disregarded her condition and the medical note. In doing so, the staff involved have contravened the Regulated Health Professions Act and this carries a hefty penalty.
On Oct 10th, city workers appeared at her house unannounced. She was prepared and had placed the “No trespass” signs on her property and she exercised her right as the owner/occupier of her property and with the assistance of the police the workers left.
Now Jaime is taking the Town to court! Join us to tonight to hear her story!
Links from the Zoom:
- Link to No Trespass sign: https://stand4thee.com/flyers-and-handouts
- Neptune Technology Group; https://www.neptunetg.com/smartcities/
- Municipal Act; https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/01m25
- EMF Help Center - Smart Meter; https://emfhelpcenter.com
- Book; lady https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/194525268-under-a-rock
- Canadians 4 Safety; https://www.facebook.com/C4ST.ORG/
Watch the replay here: https://rumble.com/v5j7tbp-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-oct-18-taking-on-the-town.html
Friday Night Zoom Replay Oct 11 - CULLEN'S VICTORY
Glory to God! WE did it! All charges were dropped, and my acquittal was upheld!
From the ruling:
" The Crown's appeal from Blouin J.'s order is dismissed. The defendant's appeal from De Filippis J.'s order is allowed. The conviction is quashed, and an order is substituted dismissing the information. The Crown's appeal from sentence is dismissed as moot. "
Cullen and Chris Wiesdorf joined us in a post win celebration to discuss the case and this HUGE win for Cullen and Canadians!
This win PROVES that the court does regard public opinion so a tremendous THANK YOU to everyone who submitted the public interest letter, shared Cullen’s story and SHOWED up in Welland!
Trust that YOUR voice made a difference in this ruling!
LINK TO CULLEN'S FACTUM HERE:https://stand4thee.com/court-case-studies
Watch the replay HERE: https://rumble.com/v5il8v9-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-oct-11-cullens-win.html
Stand4thee Friday Night Zoom Sept 20th- Jam Packed Night!
We are so sadden to report that we received the call this morning that Tommy's home has been destroyed. We found out the province the pushed through a city permit and demolished his home even though litigation is pending. We’ll discuss the next steps for Tommy.
Bill C-293, the Pandemic Treaty is moving through the senate with only 2 more readings. Can the Senate kill a bill? Yes, they can through a "hoist", "reasoned" or "deferral motion"!
Also, Cullen's appeal is coming up fast! One of the most important cases in Canada. We need to fill the court room on Oct 11, @ 10am in Welland!
Finally, is small claims the right venue for suing the government over the Emergencies Act?
Links shared in the Zoom:
- Public interest for King v McDonald: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1piEIk-5BBtzvjZyXT7iY5jEJt1INFxRz/edit
- Download the senate letter for Bill C-293, WHO Pandemic Treaty HERE: https://tinyurl.com/3u4bnpxv
- Senate procedures on how the Senate can use Hoist, Reason or Referral to KILL a BILL: https://sencanada.ca/en/about/procedural-references/notes/n5?fbclid=IwY2xjawFa4thleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHfbwSp4koh9tMn1J8zA9bPvG1xDnC6r6zBHENAg1_1IBkUEQFOdRYEHzyg_aem_w4a0weBZdOtW9u3GS2EG
- Bird flu summit NY Oct 2nd: Senate procedures: https://sencanada.ca/en/about/procedural-references/notes/n5?fbclid=IwY2xjawFa4thleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHfbwSp4koh9tMn1J8zA9bPvG1xDnC6r6zBHENAg1_1IBkUEQFOdRYEHzyg_aem_w4
- Federal courts are statute, therefore bastard courts: https://www.fct-cf.gc.ca/en/pages/about-the-court/jurisdiction
- History of Courts Ontario explaining inherent jurisdiction: https://www.ontariocourts.ca/scj/about/history/
- Fundraiser for Loving Mom fighting the CCLA's challenge of New Brunswick's Policy 713: https://www.givesendgo.com/leave-our-kids-alone
Watch the live replay HERE:https://rumble.com/v5fqhmt-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-sept-20-jam-packed-night.html
stand4thee Friday zoom Aug 23 - Court of Injustice
Rebecca shared the incredible corruption she faced during her trial in Mississauga this past week.
On Tues, Aug 20th, Rebecca returned to the Mississauga courthouse to finish the trial for failing to comply with a section 58 the Quarantine Act for not complying with the unlawful demand to perform a PCR test.
It was obvious the JP arrived to the courtroom with a guilty verdict. Rebecca stood up against perjury, bullying, attempted sabotage and intimidation and eventually forced the hand of the prosector to drop the charges.
The actions of the Crown Patterson, JP McLear and Court Admin Polley, are unacceptable and expose the corruption of the court.
Plus get the latest on the battle to save Tommy's home. The province is in for a long battle, they most likely won't win!
Links discussed in the Zoom:
1. Quarantine Act: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/q-1.1/FullText.html
2. Contraventions Act: https://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-38.7/FullText.html
3. Application of Provincial Laws Regulations: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/sor-96-312/FullText.html
4. Department of Justice Act: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/j-2/FullText.html
5. Department of Health Act: https://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/H-3.2/
6. Constitution Act: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/FullText.html
Watch the replay HERE: https://rumble.com/v5c53cd-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-aug-23rd-court-of-injustice.html
stand4thee Friday zoom Aug 3 - who is the government
How well do you know the Canadian Government system?
Before going too far into this topic, it’s fair to state that everyone is feeling that there are major concerns in our current world and that change is needed.
However, there is a growing trend to “exit the system” or to create a “new system”. You will hear terms like “de facto” government or fingers being pointed at the Crown as to the cause of the significant local and international issues we are currently facing.
While we can assume that most who hold this viewpoint are sincere and believe this to be the only way, we need to peel back the onion to get an understanding of the bigger picture. This starts with developing a solid awareness of the government framework that makes up Canada.
Let’s start with a few questions that we will discuss as a group:
- Who is the head of state in Canada?
- Who/what makes up the government of Canada?
- What is the role of the MPs?
It’s key that we understand the framework of Canada and the roles of the Government. Through this we will very quickly realize the perversion that has taken place in the house and the legislature. Out of this realization we can look to restore true government and seek accountability.
Links from the discussion:
1. Constitution Act 1867 – 1982, https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/FullText.html
2. Trudeau Infrastructure Announcement 2020 Toronto, https://www.cpac.ca/headline-politics/episode/pm-trudeau-on-toronto-floods-canada-public-transit-fund--july-17-2024?id=5c880b70-b22b-4ff7-9723-48529eb800e2 – at the 7:11 mark
3. Amanda Ridding’s Substack, https://amandaridding.substack.com
4. Rules of Civil Procedure, Small Claims, https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/980258
5. Charter of Rights, Chartepedia, https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art1.html
6. Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Schedule B, https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/laws/stat/schedule-b-to-the-canada-act-1982-uk-1982-c-11/latest/schedule-b-to-the-canada-act-1982-uk-1982-c-11.html
7. Municipal Act, Ontario, https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/01m25
Watch the replay HERE: https://rumble.com/v59i09o-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-aug-2nd-who-is-the-government.html
Stand4THEE Friday Night Zoom July 19th - Much to Do!
There is a lot going on, and we had a LOT to talk about!
First, we’ve been digging around into government ArriveSCAM contracts and well, things aren’t as they seem. Most of you are probably familiar with Botler, the original whistleblower, and GC Strategies contractor currently in the hot seat for ArriveSCAM. What if there were no contracts found for Botler nor CBSA contracts for GC Strategies in the Government database? Wouldn’t that raise an eyebrow given the committee is ONLY focusing on GC Strategies, who has NO history of contracts with the CBSA?
We've been doing forensics and there is a whole lotta mistruths going on in the committee. Here are the findings of this preliminary ArriveSCAM contract research from the Fed government database:
1. Dalian was awarded $8 million in CBSA contracts 2019 - 2023
2. Coradix was awarded a staggering $63 million in CBSA contracts
Note: the entirety of Coradix contracts totals =$1 BILLION DOLLARS IN 10 YEARS
3. BDO awarded $44 million in CBSA contracts from 2020-2024
4. KPMG awarded $973,000 in contracts from 2018 – 2023
5. Botler AI = ZERO CONTRACTS
6. GC Strategies = ZERO CONTRACTS
Total IT contracts with CBSA in 5 years = $115 MILLION!
All the spreadsheets from these contracts have been archived for your perusing HERE.
If this has piqued your curiosity you can do your own search on the Federal contract database HERE.
Also, a follow up on the Quarantine Act win, R v Fernando that found the PCR test unlawful per section 14.1 of the Act. GREAT news for anyone continuing in court. Yesterday in R v. Szacon the defendant's charges under section 14.1 were dismissed after being arraigned! This means, if you have charges for PCR, request the charges be dismissed if the Crown doesn't.
Finally, we have direction from a process server so let’s discuss as a group the next steps for serving the small claims to the Liberal criminals! Read the rules for service of small claims HERE.
Watch the replay HERE: https://rumble.com/v57msth-july-19-2024.html
Friday Night Zoom Replay June 28 - BIG Win!
In 2022 alone, over 19,000 Canadians refused to comply with the unlawful Quarantine Orders totalling a whopping $15 million in fines and countless hours in the courtroom. Many, despite their best arguments, were convicted and forced to pay thousands of dollars in fines.
The tides are turning friends! On June 26th in the Ontario Court of Justice on appeal, Judge Monahan was compelled to overturn and acquit a fine of $5,000.00 to Ms. Fernando, a traveller who refused to consent to a PCR test. The argument had been brought before the courts countless times; section 14 of the Quarantine Act clearly states that a foreign instrument cannot be inserted into the body as a screening tool and without success.
Chris Weisdorf, (a non- lawyer) presented excellent arguments and Judge Monahan, who is a seasoned Superior Court Judge, agreed and ruled in Chris’ favor and the conviction was overturned!
The following arguments are now cemented in this case law, R. v. Fernando:
- The Justice of the Peace had not addressed the argument under section 14 of the Quarantine Act;
- The Act doesn't allow for the use of PCR as screening test as it's a foreign object entering the body;
- The Quarantine Act specifically says that screening technology maybe used that does not involve entry into the human body;
- The Governor General may not deny entry of a Canadian Citizen into the country when they're entering from a country with a communicable disease when Canada is prepared (which Canada was);
- The PCR test met the Oxford dictionary definition of an instrument;
- The PCR test met the Oxford dictionary definition of a foreign body;
- The Order in Council did not expand the powers to health agents;
- Pre-arrival tests performed in other countries were not part of this ruling;
- The refusal was lawful and should not have been found guilty by the Justice of the Peace.
In addition to this win, If you were charged AFTER Oct 26, 2021, you might want to consider firing up your appeal application!
On Mon, April 22nd during Rebecca's trial for failing to do the PCR test at Pearson Airport it was discovered that the Public Health Agency of Canada screening and quarantine officers were failing to follow the rules in the Quarantine Act.
The PHAC screening officers are REQUIRED to follow these sections of the Quarantine Act... instead, the PHAC screening officers and the PHAC quarantine regional managers made a unilateral decision to disregard the requirements set out in section 16(1)(b) of the Quarantine Act.
Quarantine Act: Screening technology14 (1) Any qualified person authorized by the Minister may, to determine whether a traveller has a communicable disease or symptoms of one, use any screening technology authorized by the Minister that does not involve the entry into the traveller’s body of any instrument or other foreign body.
Obligation to inform16 (1) A screening officer shall immediately inform a quarantine officer, and follow any directive of that officer respecting the traveller, if (b) a traveller has refused to be screened by the screening officer under subsection 14(1), or a person authorized to use the screening technology has informed the screening officer that a traveller has refused to be screened under that subsection;
The PHAC officers had ONE job... to administer the Quarantine Act in its entirety. They were not there to decide which parts of the act to exclude, that is above their pay grade.
What does this mean for the rest of us? First, it confirms WE CAN WIN in the court. Second, it solidifies that those responsible for enforcing law are obligated to follow the law!
If you are still battling charges for refusing the PCR test when returning to Canada this is your new argument! If you WERE convicted, you need be EXONERATED and your money returned to you!
Links from the Zoom:
- Link to CanLii to request the ruling be uploaded; Here is the link to Canlii: https://www.canlii.org/en/feedback/feedback.html - Case info: Name of court, board or tribunal - Ontario court of justice Case name - Peel Region Date of decision - Wed, June 26, 2024 Docket or file number Name of judge or adjudicator - Judge Monahan
- Link to Cullen's fundraiser to buy transcripts for his appeal and legal consultation, the most significant cases in Canada today; https://fundrazr.com/02Lo10?ref=ab_AVbHmQaNFazAVbHmQaNFaz
- Fund raiser for Byron Carr, https://fundrazr.com/c2OiLf?ref=ab_0DDzM3_ab_4CSkMvokaXh4CSkMvokaXh&utm_campaign=campaign-launched-notification&utm_medium=email&utm_source=05-2024
- Link to Industry Advisory Table: Link to advisory table, https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/covid19-industry/medical-devices/testing-outreach-collaboration/industry-advisory-roundtable/members.html
Watch the replay here: https://rumble.com/v54e3ap-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-june-28-quarantine-act-win.html