Canada! Are you ready for the GRAND JURY?

Woman Battles Town to Stop Smart Meter!

Jaime’s battle began in 2023 when the Town of Kingsville sent out a notice informing the community the Town is moving from the existing water meters to Automated Metering Infrastructure (AMI) SMART technology meters. There was no prior notice shared to the residents and therefore no proper consultation.

Jaime’s been diagnosed with lesions on her brain through an MRI scan and suffers severe migraines, dizziness, tingling and burning sensations when she is exposed to EMF technology. She has shared this diagnosis and a doctor’s note that expressly states Jaime is to avoid SMART technology yet the city employees involved in this case have disregarded her condition and the medical note. In doing so, the staff involved have contravened the Regulated Health Professions Act and this carries a hefty penalty.

On Oct 10th, city workers appeared at her house unannounced. She was prepared and had placed the “No trespass” signs on her property and she exercised her right as the owner/occupier of her property and with the assistance of the police the workers left.

Now Jaime is taking the Town to court! Join us to tonight to hear her story!

Links from the Zoom:

- Link to No Trespass sign: https://stand4thee.com/flyers-and-handouts

- Neptune Technology Group; https://www.neptunetg.com/smartcities/

- Municipal Act; https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/01m25

- EMF Help Center - Smart Meter; https://emfhelpcenter.com

- Book; lady https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/194525268-under-a-rock

- Canadians 4 Safety; https://www.facebook.com/C4ST.ORG/

Watch the replay here: https://rumble.com/v5j7tbp-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-oct-18-taking-on-the-town.html

TOGETHER, WE CAN STOP Bill C-293!

Bill C-293 has started moving through the Senate again and was debated at Committee this past Tuesday. You can read the transcript from the committee HERE: https://www.parl.ca/LegisInfo/en/bill/44-1/C-293?view=details#bill-profile-tabs

While there are a lot of major concerns about this bill, one of the most interesting is that this is a private member's bill put forward by MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith of East Beaches in Toronto. We'll dig into what a "private member's bill” from a procedural perspective tonight

The purpose of the bill is to create a domestic legal framework to implement the WHO Pandemic Treaty with the ultimate goal of creating a "One Health" system. The provisions in this bill expand into all facets of our lives; healthcare, agriculture, logistics, mobility, etc. And it further aims to put all the power into one individual, the Minister of Health, by bypassing Parliamentary oversight that is required in a democracy. You can read more on the dangers of this bill HERE: https://canucklaw.ca/bill-c-293-international-pandemic-treaty-revisited

Actions you can take now! 

1. Join us in our working sessions as we produce legal strategies to stop the bill. Meeting times are posted under “events" 
2. Email the senate and tell them to KILL the Bill;
3. Email the Bill sponsor, Nathaniel Erskine-Smith to tell him to rescind this Bill;
4. Download the social posts and share them on your channels;
5. Talk to your friends and family to help educate them.

All the above information can be found HERE.https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1KmYlke-1-Ds_JTJkBihrfqS8RQ1B5Rut?usp=sharing

Join us Sun, Nov 3rd @ 8PM (EST) for a working session to take action to KILL Bill C-293! 

Zoom link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88194918110

Watch the replay HERE: https://rumble.com/v5k4wxx-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-oct-25-kill-the-bill.html

The court battle of Givogue v. Attorney General of Canada, challenging genetic discrimination.

On October 10, 2024 at 9:30 AM Andre Givogue faces off against the Attorney General of Canada. Andre is challenging how the genetic PCR test and RNA technology have created discriminatory practices in the workplace policies during COVID. Andre will be joining us to share the details of his challenge.

This appeal has wide-reaching implications, as it could set a precedent for how genetic information is protected in Canadian workplaces.

Read the full story on Andre's at Andrefightsback.com.

Links discussed in the Zoom:

- Bill S-201, Genetic Non-discrimination Act: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/G-2.5/FullText.html

- Bill C-293, Pandemic treaty: https://www.parl.ca/LegisInfo/en/bill/44-1/C-293

- Letter to the Senate RE: Bill C-293: https://tinyurl.com/3u4bnpxv

- Senate Procedures to Kill a Bill: https://sencanada.ca/en/about/procedural-references/notes/n5#

- Bill c-63, Online Harms Act: https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/44-1/c-63

- Bill S-233, Universal Basic Income (Senate bill): https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/44-1/s-233

- Bill C-233, DEAD BILL on Universal Basic Income: https://www.parl.ca/LegisInfo/en/bill/44-1/C-223

Watch the live replay HERE: https://rumble.com/v5gmclx-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-sept-27th-andre-takes-on-a-giant.html

We are so sadden to report that we received the call this morning that Tommy's home has been destroyed. We found out the province the pushed through a city permit and demolished his home even though litigation is pending. We’ll discuss the next steps for Tommy.

Bill C-293, the Pandemic Treaty is moving through the senate with only 2 more readings. Can the Senate kill a bill? Yes, they can through a "hoist", "reasoned" or "deferral motion"! 

Also, Cullen's appeal is coming up fast! One of the most important cases in Canada. We need to fill the court room on Oct 11, @ 10am in Welland! 

Finally, is small claims the right venue for suing the government over the Emergencies Act?

Links shared in the Zoom:

- Public interest for King v McDonald: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1piEIk-5BBtzvjZyXT7iY5jEJt1INFxRz/edit

- Download the senate letter for Bill C-293, WHO Pandemic Treaty HERE: https://tinyurl.com/3u4bnpxv

- Senate procedures on how the Senate can use Hoist, Reason or Referral to KILL a BILL: https://sencanada.ca/en/about/procedural-references/notes/n5?fbclid=IwY2xjawFa4thleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHfbwSp4koh9tMn1J8zA9bPvG1xDnC6r6zBHENAg1_1IBkUEQFOdRYEHzyg_aem_w4a0weBZdOtW9u3GS2EG

- Bird flu summit NY Oct 2nd: Senate procedures: https://sencanada.ca/en/about/procedural-references/notes/n5?fbclid=IwY2xjawFa4thleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHfbwSp4koh9tMn1J8zA9bPvG1xDnC6r6zBHENAg1_1IBkUEQFOdRYEHzyg_aem_w4

- Federal courts are statute, therefore bastard courts: https://www.fct-cf.gc.ca/en/pages/about-the-court/jurisdiction

- History of Courts Ontario explaining inherent jurisdiction: https://www.ontariocourts.ca/scj/about/history/

-  Fundraiser for Loving Mom fighting the CCLA's challenge of New Brunswick's Policy 713: https://www.givesendgo.com/leave-our-kids-alone

Watch the live replay HERE:https://rumble.com/v5fqhmt-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-sept-20-jam-packed-night.html

Just when things can’t get crazier… have you heard the latest from the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)? PHAC has ordered that all C-19 vax-ines in Canada be destroyed. No explanation has been provided other than a new version is being released. Further to this, PHAC is asking the DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) be integrated into the WHO pandemic treaty. 

In politics, NDP puppet Jagmeet has broken up with Trudeau. Does this mean a snap election is going to be called soon? The Conservatives have been campaigning for the last year, so all signs are pointing to election! How will Canadians vote?

Cullen’s appeal hearing is not far away! In just a few weeks on Oct 11th we’ll be in Welland to PACK that courtroom in support of Cullen.

Link from the Zoom: 

1.  News article regarding destruction of old vaccines: https://www.cp24.com/news/phac-explains-reason-for-pulling-covid-19-vaccines-before-new-ones-approved-1.7032461

2.  PHAC DEI in Pandemic Treaty: https://tnc.news/2024/09/01/dei-misinformation-measures-canada-who-global-pandemic-treaty

3.  Jagmeet breaks up with Trudeau: https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/what-s-next-for-singh-and-his-broken-political-pact-with-trudeau-1.7026023

4.  King v McDonald: https://rumble.com/v5axllh-call-to-action-to-attend-the-appeal-of-cullen-mcdonald-fri-aug-16th.html

5. Toronto man charged for TIkTok post: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/toronto-man-charged-threats-trudeau-freeland-tiktok-1.7315560

Finally, the thought police are at it again as a Toronto man has been charged for his TikTok posts.

Link to the Zoom replay:  https://rumble.com/v5dxxzx-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-sept-6-whats-cooking.html

If this school year is anything like the past, your children are going to be subjected to questionable subjects and questionable health measures that infringe on the rights of parents and children.

Let’s connect to look at these pressing issues our children face and discuss actions for parents to take back your authority and protect your children.

Check out the parent info package on our site here: https://stand4thee.com/parent-info-%2B-action

We have a Mama Bear joining us who is taking on the court challenge in New Brunswick initiated by the CCLA opposing Policy 713. Policy 713, originally designed to keep parents in the dark was updated to ensure parents give consent. Now this is being challenged.

Links discussed in the Zoom:

1.  Policy 713 New Brunswick, https://www2.gnb.ca/content/dam/gnb/Departments/ed/pdf/K12/policies-politiques/e/713-2023-07-01.pdf

2.  CCLA challenge of Policy 713, https://ccla.org/major-cases-and-reports/policy-713/

Watch the replay HERE: https://rumble.com/v5c53cd-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-aug-23rd-court-of-injustice.html

Rebecca shared the incredible corruption she faced during her trial in Mississauga this past week.

On Tues, Aug 20th, Rebecca returned to the Mississauga courthouse to finish the trial for failing to comply with a section 58 the Quarantine Act for not complying with the unlawful demand to perform a PCR test. 

It was obvious the JP arrived to the courtroom with a guilty verdict. Rebecca stood up against perjury, bullying, attempted sabotage and intimidation and eventually forced the hand of the prosector to drop the charges.

The actions of the Crown Patterson, JP McLear and Court Admin Polley, are unacceptable and expose the corruption of the court.

Plus get the latest on the battle to save Tommy's home. The province is in for a long battle, they most likely won't win!

Links discussed in the Zoom:

1. Quarantine Act: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/q-1.1/FullText.html

2. Contraventions Act: https://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-38.7/FullText.html

3. Application of Provincial Laws Regulations: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/sor-96-312/FullText.html

4. Department of Justice Act: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/j-2/FullText.html

5. Department of Health Act: https://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/H-3.2/

6. Constitution Act:  https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/FullText.html

Watch the replay HERE: https://rumble.com/v5c53cd-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-aug-23rd-court-of-injustice.html

How well do you know the Canadian Government system? 

Before going too far into this topic, it’s fair to state that everyone is feeling that there are major concerns in our current world and that change is needed. 

However, there is a growing trend to “exit the system” or to create a “new system”. You will hear terms like “de facto” government or fingers being pointed at the Crown as to the cause of the significant local and international issues we are currently facing.

While we can assume that most who hold this viewpoint are sincere and believe this to be the only way, we need to peel back the onion to get an understanding of the bigger picture. This starts with developing a solid awareness of the government framework that makes up Canada. 

Let’s start with a few questions that we will discuss as a group: 

1. Who is the head of state in Canada? 
2. Who/what makes up the government of Canada? 
3. What is the role of the MPs? 

It’s key that we understand the framework of Canada and the roles of the Government. Through this we will very quickly realize the perversion that has taken place in the house and the legislature. Out of this realization we can look to restore true government and seek accountability.

Links from the discussion:

1.  Constitution Act 1867 – 1982, https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/FullText.html

2.  Trudeau Infrastructure Announcement 2020 Toronto, https://www.cpac.ca/headline-politics/episode/pm-trudeau-on-toronto-floods-canada-public-transit-fund--july-17-2024?id=5c880b70-b22b-4ff7-9723-48529eb800e2 – at the 7:11 mark

3.  Amanda Ridding’s Substack, https://amandaridding.substack.com

4.  Rules of Civil Procedure, Small Claims, https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/980258

5.  Charter of Rights, Chartepedia, https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art1.html

6.  Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Schedule B, https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/laws/stat/schedule-b-to-the-canada-act-1982-uk-1982-c-11/latest/schedule-b-to-the-canada-act-1982-uk-1982-c-11.html

7.  Municipal Act, Ontario, https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/01m25

Watch the replay HERE: https://rumble.com/v59i09o-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-aug-2nd-who-is-the-government.html

There is a lot going on, and we had a LOT to talk about!

First, we’ve been digging around into government ArriveSCAM contracts and well, things aren’t as they seem. Most of you are probably familiar with Botler, the original whistleblower, and GC Strategies contractor currently in the hot seat for ArriveSCAM. What if there were no contracts found for Botler nor CBSA contracts for GC Strategies in the Government database? Wouldn’t that raise an eyebrow given the committee is ONLY focusing on GC Strategies, who has NO history of contracts with the CBSA? 

We've been doing forensics and there is a whole lotta mistruths going on in the committee. Here are the findings of this preliminary ArriveSCAM contract research from the Fed government database:
1. Dalian was awarded $8 million in CBSA contracts 2019 - 2023

2. Coradix was awarded a staggering $63 million in CBSA contracts
 Note: the entirety of Coradix contracts totals =$1 BILLION DOLLARS IN 10 YEARS

3. BDO awarded $44 million in CBSA contracts from 2020-2024

4. KPMG awarded $973,000 in contracts from 2018 – 2023

5. Botler AI = ZERO CONTRACTS

6. GC Strategies = ZERO CONTRACTS

Total IT contracts with CBSA in 5 years = $115 MILLION!

All the spreadsheets from these contracts have been archived for your perusing HERE.

If this has piqued your curiosity you can do your own search on the Federal contract database HERE.

Also, a follow up on the Quarantine Act win, R v Fernando that found the PCR test unlawful per section 14.1 of the Act. GREAT news for anyone continuing in court. Yesterday in R v. Szacon the defendant's charges under section 14.1 were dismissed after being arraigned! This means, if you have charges for PCR, request the charges be dismissed if the Crown doesn't.

Finally, we have direction from a process server so let’s discuss as a group the next steps for serving the small claims to the Liberal criminals! Read the rules for service of small claims HERE.

Watch the replay HERE: https://rumble.com/v57msth-july-19-2024.html

We have received a lot of questions on the recent Quarantine Act ruling that found the PCR test for travellers to be unlawful. To clear up these questions, let dig into the decision. 

Also, as promised we’ll follow-up on the self-rep zoom this past Monday on how to serve your civil claim to the defendant. The revised overview of the process can be found HERE:

Lastly, what that heck is the Board of Internal Economics (BOIE). We’ll dig into the latest finding and try and make sense of how this Federal board came to be and what’s its true purpose is? 

Links from the Zoom:

- Quarantine Act: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/q-1.1/FullText.html

Justice Monahan ruling on section 14 of the Quarantine Act on CanLii: CanLii: https://www.canlii.org/en/on/oncj/doc/2024/2024oncj336/2024oncj336.html

- Link to ONE of the Orders in Council for the Quarantine Act: https://orders-in-council.canada.ca/attachment.php?attach=41626&lang=en

- Link to the Department of Justice act: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/j-2/FullText.html

- Link to the Department of Health Act: https://lois-laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/h-3.2/FullText.html

- Link to Constitution Act 1867 - 1982: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/FullText.html

- Link to Board of Internal Economics: https://www.ourcommons.ca/About/Administration/index-e.html

- List of municipalities passing universal basic income (UBI) motions: https://www.big-ns.org/updated-resolution-list

- Link to UBI Bill S-233, still sitting in second reading: https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/44-1/s-233

Watch the replay HERE: https://rumble.com/v56qlz1-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-july-12-recap.html

In 2022 alone, over 19,000 Canadians refused to comply with the unlawful Quarantine Orders totalling a whopping $15 million in fines and countless hours in the courtroom. Many, despite their best arguments, were convicted and forced to pay thousands of dollars in fines.

The tides are turning friends! On June 26th in the Ontario Court of Justice on appeal, Judge Monahan was compelled to overturn and acquit a fine of $5,000.00 to Ms. Fernando, a traveller who refused to consent to a PCR test. The argument had been brought before the courts countless times; section 14 of the Quarantine Act clearly states that a foreign instrument cannot be inserted into the body as a screening tool and without success.

Chris Weisdorf, (a non- lawyer) presented excellent arguments and Judge Monahan, who is a seasoned Superior Court Judge, agreed and ruled in Chris’ favor and the conviction was overturned! 

The following arguments are now cemented in this case law, R. v. Fernando:
- The Justice of the Peace had not addressed the argument under section 14 of the Quarantine Act;
- The Act doesn't allow for the use of PCR as screening test as it's a foreign object entering the body;
- The Quarantine Act specifically says that screening technology maybe used that does not involve entry into the human body;
- The Governor General may not deny entry of a Canadian Citizen into the country when they're entering from a country with a communicable disease when Canada is prepared (which Canada was);
- The PCR test met the Oxford dictionary definition of an instrument;
- The PCR test met the Oxford dictionary definition of a foreign body;
- The Order in Council did not expand the powers to health agents;
- Pre-arrival tests performed in other countries were not part of this ruling;
- The refusal was lawful and should not have been found guilty by the Justice of the Peace.

In addition to this win, If you were charged AFTER Oct 26, 2021, you might want to consider firing up your appeal application!  

On Mon, April 22nd during Rebecca's trial for failing to do the PCR test at Pearson Airport it was discovered that the Public Health Agency of Canada screening and quarantine officers were failing to follow the rules in the Quarantine Act.

The PHAC screening officers are REQUIRED to follow these sections of the Quarantine Act... instead, the PHAC screening officers and the PHAC quarantine regional managers made a unilateral decision to disregard the requirements set out in section 16(1)(b) of the Quarantine Act.   

Quarantine Act: Screening technology14 (1) Any qualified person authorized by the Minister may, to determine whether a traveller has a communicable disease or symptoms of one, use any screening technology authorized by the Minister that does not involve the entry into the traveller’s body of any instrument or other foreign body. 

Obligation to inform16 (1) A screening officer shall immediately inform a quarantine officer, and follow any directive of that officer respecting the traveller, if  (b) a traveller has refused to be screened by the screening officer under subsection 14(1), or a person authorized to use the screening technology has informed the screening officer that a traveller has refused to be screened under that subsection;
The PHAC officers had ONE job... to administer the Quarantine Act in its entirety. They were not there to decide which parts of the act to exclude, that is above their pay grade.

What does this mean for the rest of us? First, it confirms WE CAN WIN in the court. Second, it solidifies that those responsible for enforcing law are obligated to follow the law!

If you are still battling charges for refusing the PCR test when returning to Canada this is your new argument! If you WERE convicted, you need be EXONERATED and your money returned to you!

Links from the Zoom:
- Link to CanLii to request the ruling be uploaded; Here is the link to Canlii: https://www.canlii.org/en/feedback/feedback.html - Case info: Name of court, board or tribunal - Ontario court of justice Case name - Peel Region Date of decision - Wed, June 26, 2024 Docket or file number Name of judge or adjudicator - Judge Monahan
- Link to Cullen's fundraiser to buy transcripts for his appeal and legal consultation, the most significant cases in Canada today; https://fundrazr.com/02Lo10?ref=ab_AVbHmQaNFazAVbHmQaNFaz

- Fund raiser for Byron Carr, https://fundrazr.com/c2OiLf?ref=ab_0DDzM3_ab_4CSkMvokaXh4CSkMvokaXh&utm_campaign=campaign-launched-notification&utm_medium=email&utm_source=05-2024
- Link to Industry Advisory Table: Link to advisory table, https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/covid19-industry/medical-devices/testing-outreach-collaboration/industry-advisory-roundtable/members.html

Watch the replay here: https://rumble.com/v54e3ap-stand4thee-friday-night-zoom-june-28-quarantine-act-win.html